Screener
IOO vs IWO
iShares Global 100 ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Key differences
- IWO costs 0.16% less per year.
- IOO covers global markets; IWO covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IOO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IOO | IWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.5B | $13.9B |
| Since | 2000 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.2% | +43.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.9% | +19.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.3% | +6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.31 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.60% | 21.41% |
| Max drawdown | -31.43% | -42.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IOO and IWO
Explore further