Screener
IOO vs IWL
iShares Global 100 ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.25% less per year.
- IOO is significantly larger than IWL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IOO covers global markets; IWL covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IOO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IOO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IOO | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.5B | $2.1B |
| Since | 2000 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.8% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.1% | +24.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.9% | +14.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.63% | 12.34% |
| Max drawdown | -31.43% | -32.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IOO and IWL
Explore further