Screener
IOO vs IWM
iShares Global 100 ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- IWM costs 0.21% less per year.
- IWM is significantly larger than IOO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IOO covers global markets; IWM covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IOO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IOO | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.5B | $76.9B |
| Since | 2000 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.8% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.1% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.9% | +6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.63% | 19.22% |
| Max drawdown | -31.43% | -41.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IOO and IWM
Explore further