Screener
IOO vs RIFR
iShares Global 100 ETF vs Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IOO costs 0.19% less per year.
- IOO is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IOO follows a index tracking strategy; RIFR uses active selection.
- IOO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IOO | RIFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.5B | $42M |
| Since | 2000 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.8% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.63% | 10.46% |
| Max drawdown | -31.43% | -6.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IOO and RIFR
Explore further