Screener
RIFR vs GII
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- GII costs 0.19% less per year.
- GII is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RIFR follows a active selection strategy; GII uses index tracking.
- GII has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RIFR | GII | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $989M |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.0% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.46% | 10.60% |
| Max drawdown | -6.80% | -42.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RIFR and GII
Explore further