Screener
IPAV vs GXIG
Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF vs Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- GXIG costs 0.40% less per year.
- GXIG is significantly larger than IPAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IPAV is classified as equity, while GXIG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- IPAV covers global markets; GXIG covers north america.
- IPAV follows a index tracking strategy; GXIG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPAV | GXIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $175M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | — |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.09% | — |
| Max drawdown | -14.59% | -3.19% |
Similar to IPAV and GXIG
Explore further