Screener
IPAV vs INRO
Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF vs iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
- INRO costs 0.13% less per year.
- INRO is significantly larger than IPAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IPAV covers global markets; INRO covers north america.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPAV | INRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.42% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $31M |
| Since | 2024 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 0.69% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.97% | 12.92% |
| Max drawdown | -14.59% | -20.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IPAV and INRO
Explore further