Screener
IPAV vs IFRA
Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF vs iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IFRA costs 0.25% less per year.
- IFRA is significantly larger than IPAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IPAV covers global markets; IFRA covers north america.
- IFRA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPAV | IFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $4.1B |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 1.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +30.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.97% | 14.79% |
| Max drawdown | -14.59% | -41.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IPAV and IFRA
Explore further