Screener
IPAV vs MLPA
Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF vs Global X MLP ETF
Key differences
- IPAV costs 0.22% less per year.
- MLPA is significantly larger than IPAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IPAV covers global markets; MLPA covers north america.
- MLPA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPAV | MLPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.77% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2024 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 6.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.09% | 11.95% |
| Max drawdown | -14.59% | -74.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IPAV and MLPA
Explore further