Screener
MLPA vs PAVE
Global X MLP ETF vs Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
Key differences
- PAVE costs 0.30% less per year.
- PAVE is significantly larger than MLPA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PAVE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- MLPA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MLPA | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $13.4B |
| Since | 2012 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 6.94% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.1% | +39.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.8% | +17.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.95% | 18.91% |
| Max drawdown | -74.03% | -44.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MLPA and PAVE
Explore further