Screener
IQLT vs ROE
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF vs Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
Key differences
- IQLT costs 0.19% less per year.
- IQLT is significantly larger than ROE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IQLT covers global ex us markets; ROE covers north america.
- IQLT follows a index tracking strategy; ROE uses active selection.
- IQLT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IQLT | ROE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12.9B | $239M |
| Since | 2015 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.16% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.1% | +37.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.48% | 14.02% |
| Max drawdown | -32.21% | -19.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IQLT and ROE
Explore further