Screener
ROE vs AQLT
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Quality Factor ETF
Key differences
- AQLT costs 0.29% less per year.
- ROE covers north america markets; AQLT covers global.
- ROE follows a active selection strategy; AQLT uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROE | AQLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $239M | $246M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.01% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.5% | +31.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | 13.49% |
| Max drawdown | -19.10% | -16.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROE and AQLT
Explore further