Screener
IRVH vs SPFF
Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF vs Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF
Key differences
Both IRVH and SPFF are fixed income ETFs. IRVH charges 0.45% a year and SPFF 0.48%. The main difference: IRVH follows a multi strategy strategy; SPFF uses index tracking.
- IRVH follows a multi strategy strategy; SPFF uses index tracking.
- SPFF is much larger than IRVH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, SPFF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPFF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IRVH | SPFF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $144M |
| Since | 2022 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 5.50% | 6.32% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.8% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | -0.5% | +8.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.61 | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.87% | 9.85% |
| Max drawdown | -14.97% | -35.92% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.