Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ISBG vs SIVR

IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF vs abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

ISBG

IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF

Annual cost

1.14%

Fund size

$5M

SIVR

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

Annual cost

0.30%

Fund size

$5.2B

Key differences

ISBG is an alternative ETF, while SIVR is a commodity ETF. ISBG charges 1.14% a year and SIVR 0.30%.

  • ISBG is an alternative fund, while SIVR is a commodity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • SIVR costs 0.84% less per year.
  • SIVR is much larger than ISBG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • SIVR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ISBGSIVR
Annual cost (TER)1.14%0.30%
Fund size (AUM)$5M$5.2B
Since20262009
Dividend yield0.00%
Asset classalternativecommodity
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selection
CAGR 1YN/A+96.9%
CAGR 3YN/A+42.1%
CAGR 5YN/A+19.1%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.98
Volatility 1Y59.44%
Max drawdown-49.42%-42.42%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to ISBG and SIVR