Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SIVR vs BTGD

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF vs STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF

SIVR

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

Annual cost

0.30%

Fund size

$5.2B

BTGD

STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF

Annual cost

1.05%

Fund size

$55M

Key differences

SIVR is a commodity ETF, while BTGD is an alternative ETF. SIVR charges 0.30% a year and BTGD 1.05%.

  • SIVR is a commodity fund, while BTGD is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • SIVR costs 0.75% less per year.
  • SIVR is much larger than BTGD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • SIVR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

SIVRBTGD
Annual cost (TER)0.30%1.05%
Fund size (AUM)$5.2B$55M
Since20092024
Dividend yield0.00%4.08%
Asset classcommodityalternative
Region
Strategymulti strategy
CAGR 1Y+96.9%-37.2%
CAGR 3Y+42.1%N/A
CAGR 5Y+19.1%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.98N/A
Volatility 1Y59.44%55.77%
Max drawdown-42.42%-53.31%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to SIVR and BTGD