Screener
ISCG vs ACSG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF vs American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
Key differences
- ISCG costs 0.43% less per year.
- ISCG is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ISCG follows a index tracking strategy; ACSG uses active selection.
- ISCG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISCG | ACSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $947M | $15M |
| Since | 2004 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.16% | — |
| Max drawdown | -41.48% | -13.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISCG and ACSG
Explore further