Screener
ISCG vs FSGS
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF vs First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF
Key differences
- ISCG costs 0.55% less per year.
- ISCG is significantly larger than FSGS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ISCG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ISCG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISCG | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $947M | $29M |
| Since | 2004 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.4% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.7% | +8.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.5% | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.16% | 15.30% |
| Max drawdown | -41.48% | -43.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISCG and FSGS
Explore further