Screener
ISCG vs IWP
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- ISCG costs 0.17% less per year.
- IWP is significantly larger than ISCG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ISCG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISCG | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $947M | $19.6B |
| Since | 2004 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | 0.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.4% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.7% | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.5% | +7.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.16% | 16.54% |
| Max drawdown | -41.48% | -38.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISCG and IWP
Explore further