Screener
ISCV vs BLCV
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF vs iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF
Key differences
- ISCV costs 0.40% less per year.
- ISCV follows a index tracking strategy; BLCV uses active selection.
- ISCV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISCV | BLCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $651M | $317M |
| Since | 2004 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.90% | 1.29% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.2% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.48% | 11.64% |
| Max drawdown | -51.56% | -13.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISCV and BLCV
Explore further