Screener
ISCV vs FESM
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- ISCV costs 0.22% less per year.
- FESM is significantly larger than ISCV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ISCV follows a index tracking strategy; FESM uses index enhanced.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISCV | FESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $651M | $5.0B |
| Since | 2004 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.90% | 0.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.2% | +52.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.48% | 19.05% |
| Max drawdown | -51.56% | -26.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISCV and FESM
Explore further