Screener
ISHP vs QCLN
First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF vs First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
Key differences
- QCLN is significantly larger than ISHP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ISHP covers global markets; QCLN covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, QCLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- QCLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISHP | QCLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $739M |
| Since | 2016 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 0.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.1% | +118.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.1% | +12.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.5% | +3.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.44 | 0.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.08% | 34.72% |
| Max drawdown | -47.57% | -71.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISHP and QCLN
Explore further