Screener
ISMD vs BIBL
Inspire Small/Mid Cap ETF vs Inspire 100 ETF
Key differences
- BIBL costs 0.18% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, BIBL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISMD | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.53% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $292M | $436M |
| Since | 2017 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 1.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.9% | +38.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.61% | 15.38% |
| Max drawdown | -43.58% | -36.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISMD and BIBL
Explore further