Screener
ISMF vs IALT
iShares Managed Futures Active ETF vs iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF
Key differences
- ISMF costs 0.19% less per year.
- IALT is significantly larger than ISMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ISMF follows a managed futures strategy; IALT uses systematic alpha.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISMF | IALT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $57M | $210M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.50% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | managed futures | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.87% | — |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -1.47% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISMF and IALT
Explore further