Screener
ISMF vs RSIT
iShares Managed Futures Active ETF vs Return Stacked International Stocks & Managed Futures ETF
Key differences
- ISMF costs 0.18% less per year.
- ISMF follows a managed futures strategy; RSIT uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISMF | RSIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $57M | — |
| Since | 2025 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 2.50% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | managed futures | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.87% | — |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -2.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISMF and RSIT
Explore further