Screener
ISRA vs LFEQ
VanEck Israel ETF vs VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
Key differences
- ISRA is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ISRA is classified as equity, while LFEQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ISRA covers emerging markets markets; LFEQ covers north america.
- ISRA follows a index tracking strategy; LFEQ uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, ISRA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISRA | LFEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $167M | $30M |
| Since | 2013 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.24% | 0.82% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.7% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.0% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | +9.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.14% | 12.24% |
| Max drawdown | -45.02% | -35.19% |
Similar to ISRA and LFEQ
Explore further