Screener
IUSG vs BGRO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF vs iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF
Key differences
- IUSG costs 0.51% less per year.
- IUSG is significantly larger than BGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IUSG is classified as equity, while BGRO is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- IUSG follows a index tracking strategy; BGRO uses active selection.
- IUSG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IUSG | BGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30.1B | $9M |
| Since | 2000 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 0.04% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.5% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.81% | 18.04% |
| Max drawdown | -32.35% | -24.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IUSG and BGRO
Explore further