Screener
IVAL vs AAUS
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF vs Alpha Architect US Equity ETF
Key differences
- AAUS costs 0.23% less per year.
- IVAL follows a index tracking strategy; AAUS uses active selection.
- IVAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IVAL | AAUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $207M | $508M |
| Since | 2014 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.71% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.35% | — |
| Max drawdown | -46.09% | -9.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IVAL and AAUS
Explore further