Screener
IVAL vs AAVM
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF vs Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF
Key differences
- IVAL is significantly larger than AAVM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IVAL follows a index tracking strategy; AAVM uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| IVAL | AAVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $207M | $24M |
| Since | 2014 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.71% | 1.79% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.0% | +34.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.2% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.35% | 15.23% |
| Max drawdown | -46.09% | -34.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IVAL and AAVM
Explore further