Screener
IVOG vs RFG
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund ETF Shares vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- IVOG costs 0.25% less per year.
- IVOG is significantly larger than RFG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RFG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IVOG | RFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $329M |
| Since | 2010 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.57% | 0.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.4% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.7% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.2% | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.19% | 18.50% |
| Max drawdown | -39.32% | -42.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IVOG and RFG
Explore further