Screener
IVOG vs TMFM
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund ETF Shares vs Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- IVOG costs 0.75% less per year.
- IVOG is significantly larger than TMFM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IVOG follows a index tracking strategy; TMFM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IVOG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IVOG | TMFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $117M |
| Since | 2010 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.57% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.6% | -19.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.2% | +2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 0.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.30% | 17.99% |
| Max drawdown | -39.32% | -31.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IVOG and TMFM
Explore further