Screener
IVV vs AOM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF
Key differences
- IVV costs 0.12% less per year.
- IVV is significantly larger than AOM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IVV is classified as equity, while AOM is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, IVV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IVV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IVV | AOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $797.5B | $1.7B |
| Since | 2000 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.12% | 3.04% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.5% | +15.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | +10.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.0% | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.96% | 6.55% |
| Max drawdown | -33.90% | -19.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IVV and AOM
Explore further