Screener
IWB vs ACWX
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.17% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than ACWX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWB covers north america markets; ACWX covers global ex us.
- Over the last 3 years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWB | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46.2B | $11.1B |
| Since | 2000 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.9% | +32.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.5% | +9.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.07% | 15.53% |
| Max drawdown | -34.60% | -35.35% |
Similar to IWB and ACWX
Explore further