Screener
IWB vs IFRA
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.15% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than IFRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWB | IFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46.2B | $4.1B |
| Since | 2000 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 1.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +30.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | +20.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.1% | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.07% | 14.79% |
| Max drawdown | -34.60% | -41.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWB and IFRA
Explore further