Screener
IWB vs LSEQ
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 2.13% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than LSEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWB is classified as equity, while LSEQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- IWB follows a index tracking strategy; LSEQ uses long short.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWB | LSEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 2.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46.2B | $15M |
| Since | 2000 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 1.78% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +19.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.07% | 14.96% |
| Max drawdown | -34.60% | -8.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWB and LSEQ
Explore further