Screener
LSEQ vs IWM
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- IWM costs 2.09% less per year.
- IWM is significantly larger than LSEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LSEQ is classified as alternative, while IWM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- LSEQ follows a long short strategy; IWM uses index tracking.
- IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LSEQ | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.28% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $76.9B |
| Since | 2023 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.78% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.7% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.96% | 19.22% |
| Max drawdown | -8.35% | -41.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LSEQ and IWM
Explore further