Screener
IWB vs MEAR
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF
Key differences
IWB is an equity ETF, while MEAR is a fixed income ETF. IWB charges 0.15% a year and MEAR 0.26%.
- IWB is an equity fund, while MEAR is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- IWB follows a index tracking strategy; MEAR uses active selection.
- IWB costs 0.11% less per year.
- IWB is much larger than MEAR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWB | MEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48.9B | $1.4B |
| Since | 2000 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 2.86% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +3.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.2% | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | +2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | -0.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.22% | 0.86% |
| Max drawdown | -34.60% | -2.68% |
Similar to IWB and MEAR
Explore further