Screener
IWB vs OEF
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs iShares S&P 100 ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.05% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, OEF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWB | OEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46.2B | $19.6B |
| Since | 2000 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 0.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +31.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | +25.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.1% | +15.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 1.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.07% | 12.88% |
| Max drawdown | -34.60% | -31.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWB and OEF
Explore further