Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

OEF vs IWM

iShares S&P 100 ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF

OEF

iShares S&P 100 ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$19.6B

IWM

iShares Russell 2000 ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.19%

Fund size

$76.9B

Key differences

  • IWM is significantly larger than OEF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, OEF has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

OEFIWM
Annual cost (TER)0.20%0.19%
Fund size (AUM)$19.6B$76.9B
Since20002000
Dividend yield0.88%0.91%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+31.9%+41.8%
CAGR 3Y+25.8%+18.8%
CAGR 5Y+15.9%+6.5%
Sharpe 3Y1.310.75
Volatility 1Y12.88%19.22%
Max drawdown-31.44%-41.13%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to OEF and IWM