Screener
IWB vs SCHK
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs Schwab 1000 ETF
Key differences
- SCHK costs 0.12% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than SCHK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWB | SCHK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46.2B | $5.3B |
| Since | 2000 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 1.06% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | +23.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.1% | +13.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.07% | 12.30% |
| Max drawdown | -34.60% | -34.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWB and SCHK
Explore further