Screener
IWB vs SHUS
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.64% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than SHUS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWB is classified as equity, while SHUS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- IWB follows a index tracking strategy; SHUS uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWB | SHUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46.2B | $24M |
| Since | 2000 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 1.29% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.9% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +10.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.07% | 10.16% |
| Max drawdown | -34.60% | -14.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWB and SHUS
Explore further