Screener
SHUS vs SMMD
Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF vs iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Key differences
- SMMD costs 0.64% less per year.
- SMMD is significantly larger than SHUS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SHUS is classified as alternative, while SMMD is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SHUS follows a option income strategy; SMMD uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SMMD has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SHUS | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.8% | +39.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.5% | +19.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.16% | 17.31% |
| Max drawdown | -14.09% | -41.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SHUS and SMMD
Explore further