Screener
IWB vs TMFC
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
Key differences
Both IWB and TMFC are equity ETFs. IWB charges 0.15% a year and TMFC 0.50%. The main difference: IWB costs 0.35% less per year.
- IWB costs 0.35% less per year.
- IWB is much larger than TMFC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, TMFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWB | TMFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48.9B | $2.1B |
| Since | 2000 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 0.13% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +22.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.2% | +25.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | +15.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.22% | 13.85% |
| Max drawdown | -34.60% | -33.06% |
Similar to IWB and TMFC
Explore further