Screener
IWD vs BUSA
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF vs Brandes U.S. Value ETF
Key differences
- IWD costs 0.42% less per year.
- IWD is significantly larger than BUSA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWD follows a index tracking strategy; BUSA uses active selection.
- IWD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWD | BUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $74.3B | $292M |
| Since | 2000 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.55% | 1.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.5% | +23.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.88% | 11.96% |
| Max drawdown | -38.51% | -14.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWD and BUSA
Explore further