Screener
IWD vs FFLV
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap
Key differences
- IWD costs 0.20% less per year.
- IWD is significantly larger than FFLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWD covers north america markets; FFLV covers global.
- IWD follows a index tracking strategy; FFLV uses active selection.
- IWD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWD | FFLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $74.3B | $17M |
| Since | 2000 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.55% | 1.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.5% | +28.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.88% | 11.50% |
| Max drawdown | -38.51% | -16.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWD and FFLV
Explore further