Screener
IWD vs LRGF
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- LRGF costs 0.10% less per year.
- IWD is significantly larger than LRGF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWD follows a index tracking strategy; LRGF uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, LRGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWD | LRGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $74.3B | $3.3B |
| Since | 2000 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.55% | 1.13% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.5% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | +13.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.88% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -38.51% | -36.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWD and LRGF
Explore further