Screener
IWF vs FFLG
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
Both IWF and FFLG are equity ETFs. The main difference: IWF follows a index tracking strategy; FFLG uses active selection.
- IWF follows a index tracking strategy; FFLG uses active selection.
- Over the last three years, FFLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWF | FFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $132.3B | — |
| Since | 2000 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.33% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.3% | +32.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.5% | +28.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.6% | +11.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.05 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.79% | 18.87% |
| Max drawdown | -32.72% | -44.82% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.