Screener
IWL vs AOR
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF vs iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
Key differences
- IWL is classified as equity, while AOR is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- IWL follows a index tracking strategy; AOR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWL | AOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $3.5B |
| Since | 2009 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 2.53% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | +19.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.4% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.7% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.34% | 8.47% |
| Max drawdown | -32.71% | -22.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWL and AOR
Explore further