Screener
IWL vs FESM
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.13% less per year.
- IWL follows a index tracking strategy; FESM uses index enhanced.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWL | FESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $5.0B |
| Since | 2009 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | +52.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.34% | 19.05% |
| Max drawdown | -32.71% | -26.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWL and FESM
Explore further