Screener
IWL vs LRGC
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF vs AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.24% less per year.
- IWL follows a index tracking strategy; LRGC uses active selection.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWL | LRGC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $1.2B |
| Since | 2009 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.7% | +26.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.32% | 12.00% |
| Max drawdown | -32.71% | -19.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWL and LRGC
Explore further