Screener
IWL vs QNXT
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF vs iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.05% less per year.
- IWL is significantly larger than QNXT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWL | QNXT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $17M |
| Since | 2009 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.7% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.32% | 14.97% |
| Max drawdown | -32.71% | -22.25% |
Similar to IWL and QNXT
Explore further